jake's mom

4.09.2007

Wholly Constitutional Questions, Batman!

This might get interesting:
On April 25, the Supreme Court will be hearing argument on FEC v. Wisconsin Right to Life, a case which questions the constitutionality of a provision of the McCain-Feingold laws regarding "sham issue advertising"
[...]
McCain-Feingold prohibits corporations, labor unions, and national banks from using their general treasury funds to pay for any "electioneering communication." What's that? "A communication that refers to a candidate for federal office and is broadcast within the 30 days before a federal primary election or the 60 days before a federal general election ... in which that candidate is running."
But what about communications that aren't intended to affect elections? If the First Amendment protects a group's right to speak out about issues of public concern (other than on elections and candidates qua candidates), and said issues occur near election-time, we've got a conflict.

Labels: , ,

posted by C at 10:29 AM | Permalink

0 Comment(s) - Click to View/Hide

 

 
 


[ contributors ]
-contact us-
C
brian
nick
jp

[ links ]
friends
curious character
common sense dancing
phonograph
relative path
takecover!
politics
american progress
daily kos
democracy for america
talking points memo
andrew tobias
tech
engadget
slashdot
tunes
angels twenty
coolfer
kexp
largehearted boy
soma fm
stereogum
the big ticket
ttiktda


Add to MyYahoo This page is powered by Blogger.